|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
I'm not going to add the whole page go see the accomplishments of your CCA.you the recs.are in the list of regulations they so proudly display (fed. regs.on red fish. fishing license one state on & on ) they are not your friends.But they do have your money and some other deep pockets as-well.
http://www.joincca.org/Accomplishments.html
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/26/2009 10:05:32 PM
Posts: 50,
Visits: 272
|
|
| Capt. Coley, Thanks for sharing the information about the CCA and Red Snapper. I'd never been to that page before and found it quite informative. I actually read the entire page and the Red Snapper petition to help stop over fishing of red snapper was targeted at forcing Fishery Management to reduce Shrimp Trawl by-catch. I can support that action. According to the Sedar 7 report, Shrimpers were killing between 25 and 45 MILLION Red Snapper per year. The fact that the CCA lobbied to force Fisheries Management to act so that there would be a Red Snapper fishery for Recreational Fishers is not a bad thing in my book. (The SEDAR 7 Report is located at www.myfwc.com) Contrary to your comments in previous posts, I do NOT have it in for you or Charter Operators, I believe Charters are professional transportation for Recreational Fishermen and women, therefore; I believe they should remain a part of the Recreational Sector. The "reading between the lines" was actually reading the SOS proposal that has YOUR name as a sponsor. The SOS plan, as written, would cheat the small operators out of their opportunity to expand their business in the future. From the sound of your posts, you are one of the small operators that will suffer from this plan. You obviously do not understand how the historical catch data would limit your opportunity to grow your business in the future, all you can see is the hope of year-round fishing, now. Please talk to some of the small commercial operators and see if they like being locked in their historical catch IFQ. They can never compete with the big boys because they can never increase their IFQ unless they pay a kings ransom to lease or buy it from one of the big boys. If your goals are purely to improve data collection, you can achieve that portion of your plan without denying fair access to the fishery to over 2.7 million recreational fishermen. Remove the separation of the sectors portion of the proposal and you will restore harmony with the Private Recreational fishermen. Capt. Coley, It's not to late to "save yourself" by withdrawing your support for the SOS plan. Again, anyone that would like to participate in creating a "Win-Win" proposal, please contact me at candy@valp.net and share your ideas. Recreational Fishermen, if you haven't done so already, PLEASE send a nice letter to the FWC, Gulf Council and Roy Crabtree to ask that they deny the portion of the SOS plan that proposes the separation of the Recreational Sector. The SOS plan is being presented at the FFWCC meeting in Key West this Thursday! Don't assume someone else is going to speak up for you, we need EVERYONE to speak up and protest the sector separation portion of this plan. Commissioners@myfwc.com Roy.crabtree@noaa.gov gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org
Candy Hansard www.ecreef.org
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Marlin
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 5:16:01 AM
Posts: 4,384,
Visits: 17,970
|
|
| capt.eugene coley, You say that shrimp by-catch is the problem, yet you don't go after them. You go after the the recreational sector because you know that it is easier to take away from the recreational fisherman than it is to take away from a well organized group of people (shrimpers). You are going after the weakest link and it is going to harm everyone in the process. The quickest and esiest way to stop over fishing of a species is to give the status of sport fish. Look what it did for redfish. If a species trully is in danger, then the only way to stop overfishing is to stop commercial and political interests in a fish species.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "H2O: 2 parts hydrogen 1 part obsession." Jon
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
“Recreational anglers have always been willing to be the first to endure regulation fot he betterment of the resource,” said Pat Murray, CCA vice president and director of conservation.
I didn't say this your cca vice pres. said it as for shrimpers the CCA said they were the problem. I said there so few left who are they blaming now. This will probably be my last post here.So listen upAs y'all have said you have the largest body of anglers 2.7 million in Florida alone if each of you go catch 2 red snapper 5,400,000.fish multiplied by the 4 pounds the nmfs says is the average size you get 21,600,000. million pounds. I believe that the tac is only 6.something million pounds.
That is over fishing and why for hire wants separation. And you need a stamp type monitor in your sector to prove you don't catch any more or any less "not a average"
remember this tac is measured by pounds not numbers of fish this the real battle!!!!!!!!!!!
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/26/2009 10:05:32 PM
Posts: 50,
Visits: 272
|
|
I received permission to share this entire e-mail with everyone so here it is. It is an eye opener! I turned a few sentences that I found especially interesting RED. Beware of False Messiahs! I am starting a new thread to share Win Win proposal ideas with all of you. Stay tuned! Candy From: bobzales Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:37 AM To: bob2 Subject: debrief meeting Importance: High Please read the below. Apparently, the folks with the sos plan are changing tactics and intend to try to make the private rec folks think the sosers have their best interest at heart. I highlighted in red key statements by jarvis. One very quick answer to the issue mentioned at the beginning of his email, ALL, for hire fishing and recreational data, from state and federal waters whether federally permitted or not, is and has always been included in the MRFSS. Look at the red snapper landings for 07 and see where the feds said most red snapper came from, state waters. State water data is one of the many issues that have to be considered when discussing red snapper and other federally managed species. For those who may not know, jbarger, is Jeff Barger who works for Environmental Defense. Apparently, according to this email, he is the editor of many of the communications some have received from jarvis and others. This is interesting behind the scenes info from someone who tells everyone that everything is open and above board. Also for those who may not know, Andy is Andy Strelcheck, the NMFS staffer who works with most of the red snapper information and Bev, is Beverly Sauls who works for the FWRI in St Pete and works on all the recreational data for Florida and works with the Science and Technology folks of the NMFS in Silver Spring. She is also the Chairperson of the for-hire work group of the MRIP program. This meeting was held in Destin this past Tues and Wed. There were representatives of a Northeast commercial lobster fishery who use the electronic logbook system developed by Olfish, http://www.olfish.com/. This link will provide you the details of this company. As always, Andy was direct and to the point and does not mislead anyone with his knowledge of the current fishery issues. He still cannot tell us how many days of fishing will be projected for red snapper because all the data is still not available. Beverly is always informative and knows the data system and process extremely well and provided some good insight to those in attendance. Keeping you informed, Bob Begin forwarded From: GJabd@aol.com To: jbarger@edf.org Subject: debrief meeting Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:02:16 +0000 JB , good meeting .A number of things were brought out. The issue of wether charter for hire state water guide boats were included in the MRFSS data concerning our TAC % history was discussed, we are going to find out if they are our are not and how they apply to our over all plan . We need to address this before the Jan Council meeting. On the issue of the over all meeting perceptions these were noted. 1) Andy was encouraging but also conservative so as not to get our hopes too high. 2) Bev was resistive at first but warmed up somewhat during the Log book presentation when all the bells and whistles were presented. 3) In our future discussion and e-mails of the plan, the words Zales, Bobie Walker and Present leadership must be removed from MY vocabulary ( compliments of Mike Eller throwing the BS flag on me). I promised him that as of this meeting I would not do it anymore. ( I had already sent the earlier e-mail this morning showing all Charter for Hire the FWC letters. Ha! ) 4) We need to have some discussion about general ideas for how we can help the private rec sector formulate a plan that works hand in hand with ours, this to make us look like the saviors of the recreational fisheries across the board. Now to the media issue . First of all Mike,Scott and Tracy are going to put in writing a more complex explanation behind the motivation on why we want the different parts of the plan. When they finish they will send it to you to perform you editorial magic you have at your finger tips. When we start the public media approach we need to express in our info that we give out, that we are looking out for the majority of recreational anglers in our plan ,that we take millions of true recreational fishermen that fish with us. Also we need to begin to express the fact that Charter for hire fishermen from Florida and Alabama with help and input from Ms, LA are trying to help recreational fishermen Gulf wide by beginning a cutting edge forward moving plan involving not only Charter for hire businessmen, but fishery managers and environmental agency's to save red snapper from being over fished resulting in long term healthy stocks for generation of recreational anglers to catch ( damn I am beginning to sound like you ). And the last item was discussion on counting the customers that have fished with us the last few years and this up coming year as later ammo for when the Separation debate comes up . That is a brief over view from the meeting . I am cc this to the folks that were there and if any of you guys want to add anything for Jeff please feel free. See Ya Jeff Gary __________________
Candy Hansard www.ecreef.org
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/26/2009 10:05:32 PM
Posts: 50,
Visits: 272
|
|
| Please read the document linked below. This is the way NOAA is selling a public resource to private business people and in the process denying the general public access to the fishery. This is why the SOS boys want to join the IFQ program because it would guarantee that they and their families would enjoy exclusive access to the fishery while YOU and your family are denied access. This document expressly explains that the IFQ is the selling of our resource! https://ifq.sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/ifqrs...8withnoVMS.pdf We need to be ready with a second round of protest of the SOS proposal. If we sit idle, the only way we will ever have access to the fishery is to go on a charter boat. Divers, you can forget it because the dive charters won't be getting a nice chunk of the IFQ share.
Candy Hansard www.ecreef.org
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/26/2009 10:05:32 PM
Posts: 50,
Visits: 272
|
|
| For some reason the link that I copied that should have taken you directly to the IFQ frequently asked questions document doesn't work so try this then click on Frequently Asked Questions. Heck, read all the documents if you really want to have a good understanding of what is going on. https://ifq.sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/ifqrs/index.cfm
Candy Hansard www.ecreef.org
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
candy
It saden's me to see you updated this alarmist post after making such good headway on the problem of bad data!
What I see in the IFQ link is how commerical fishermen are being accountable and did not go over the TAC.given them.
and they feed there familys keep up there homes/buisness it is a way of life not going to change any time soon with accountabilty measures in place on commerical boats THEY ARE IN COMPLYENCE with the law.and came in under there TAC.
You will need a better catch phrase than THERE SELLING OUR FISH or THERE RUNNING YOU OFF THE WATER YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR FISH. If you can propose a true win win plan lets hear it! better yet let us see it work.because win win will be when all sectors are accountable.
We need to fix the rest of the fishery taking there IFQ. shuttting them down these things most likely will not happen while they are the accountable ones.
Red snapper have/are rebounding but the time frame NMFS. works with, bad data, will not show this rebound for three to five years.
The problem is in the rec. sector we must fix it inside this sector.
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:38:25 PM
Posts: 613,
Visits: 4,654
|
|
capt.eugene (12/19/2008) candy
It saden's me to see you updated this alarmist post after making such good headway on the problem of bad data!
What I see in the IFQ link is how commerical fishermen are being accountable and did not go over the TAC.given them. and they feed there familys keep up there homes/buisness it is a way of life not going to change any time soon with accountabilty measures in place on commerical boats THEY ARE IN COMPLYENCE with the law.and came in under there TAC.
You will need a better catch phrase than THERE SELLING OUR FISH or THERE RUNNING YOU OFF THE WATER YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR FISH. If you can propose a true win win plan lets hear it! better yet let us see it work.because win win will be when all sectors are accountable.
We need to fix the rest of the fishery taking there IFQ. shuttting them down these things most likely will not happen while they are the accountable ones.
Red snapper have/are rebounding but the time frame NMFS. works with, bad data, will not show this rebound for three to five years.
The problem is in the rec. sector we must fix it inside this sector.At this rate in 3-5 years they will be eating small children swimming on the beach! Once again I dissagree with the statement that the "problem" is with the rec sector. We have the best snapper fishing we have had in the last 30 years, what exactly is the problem?
Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend to lie to you and steal from you so that they can stay fat and happy.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx
If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well. Hot Spots Bait and Tackle 211 Gulf Breeze Parkway, Gulf Breeze FL www.hotspotstackle.com 850-916-7176
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
Matt Mcleod (12/19/2008)
Once again I dissagree with the statement that the "problem" is with the rec sector. We have the best snapper fishing we have had in the last 30 years, what exactly is the problem?
Matt
The problem its seems lost to alot of people who don't agree with the statement rec.fisherman [ you & I ] are the problem. That statement means You & I and any other fisherman ARE NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE NMFS.
They don't know what we catch so they make up a number by using averages and some sicentific method when applied to redsnapper they say we are catching to many fish to allow rebuilding by ther deadline of yr 2010
HOPE THIS HELPS Because i agree fishing is better than ever.
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:38:25 PM
Posts: 613,
Visits: 4,654
|
|
But better catch data is only better catch data, how will that help with the problem?? Better data is not the "problem" it is a solution to a "problem". So I'm still wondering, what's the problem???
Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend to lie to you and steal from you so that they can stay fat and happy.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx
If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well. Hot Spots Bait and Tackle 211 Gulf Breeze Parkway, Gulf Breeze FL www.hotspotstackle.com 850-916-7176
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
Bad scenice/ NMFS / Mag.Stevens Act.To many fighting not fixing is my thought.
basicly gov. when it comes to rec. they don't have needed data
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:38:25 PM
Posts: 613,
Visits: 4,654
|
|
| I guess my point is that we don't have a problem. We have the nmfs trying to fix something that's not broken. Once we start negotiating TAC numbers and data we are admitting we have a problem when we don't have a problem. That is my biggest problem with ALL of the ideas I've seen so far. Why are we agreeing to help solve a problem we don't have?? And this question is not meant just for Eugene. I applaud all the work everyone has done in an effort to help us keep our right to snapper fish, but I think all of these ideas are still a way to negotiate with the nmfs and don't address the fact that we have no problem. Why am I wrong??
Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend to lie to you and steal from you so that they can stay fat and happy.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx
If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well. Hot Spots Bait and Tackle 211 Gulf Breeze Parkway, Gulf Breeze FL www.hotspotstackle.com 850-916-7176
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
Matt
I see to your point but the only two options we have are to overthrow the gov or negotiate with them.
I'M for the latter
64 Day season is a problem
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:59:27 PM
Posts: 661,
Visits: 1,284
|
|
| Eugene you need to let your boy and fellow SOS planner Gary Jarvis that he needs to shape up and exercise tighter control of his emails between himself and the Envirmental Defense Fund anti-fishing wackos. Quotes like "this to make us look like the saviors of the recreational fisheries across the board." only serve to piss good recreational fishing folks off so that we are even more are willing to mass in force and fund the fight for recreational fishing rights. [quote
From: GJabd@aol.com To: jbarger@edf.org Subject: debrief meeting Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:02:16 +0000
JB , good meeting .A number of things were brought out. The issue of wether charter for hire state water guide boats were included in the MRFSS data concerning our TAC % history was discussed, we are going to find out if they are our are not and how they apply to our over all plan . We need to address this before the Jan Council meeting. On the issue of the over all meeting perceptions these were noted. 1) Andy was encouraging but also conservative so as not to get our hopes too high. 2) Bev was resistive at first but warmed up somewhat during the Log book presentation when all the bells and whistles were presented. 3) In our future discussion and e-mails of the plan, the words Zales, Bobie Walker and Present leadership must be removed from MY vocabulary ( compliments of Mike Eller throwing the BS flag on me). I promised him that as of this meeting I would not do it anymore. ( I had already sent the earlier e-mail this morning showing all Charter for Hire the FWC letters. Ha! ) 4) We need to have some discussion about general ideas for how we can help the private rec sector formulate a plan that works hand in hand with ours, this to make us look like the saviors of the recreational fisheries across the board. Now to the media issue . First of all Mike,Scott and Tracy are going to put in writing a more complex explanation behind the motivation on why we want the different parts of the plan. When they finish they will send it to you to perform you editorial magic you have at your finger tips. When we start the public media approach we need to express in our info that we give out, that we are looking out for the majority of recreational anglers in our plan ,that we take millions of true recreational fishermen that fish with us. Also we need to begin to express the fact that Charter for hire fishermen from Florida and Alabama with help and input from Ms, LA are trying to help recreational fishermen Gulf wide by beginning a cutting edge forward moving plan involving not only Charter for hire businessmen, but fishery managers and environmental agency's to save red snapper from being over fished resulting in long term healthy stocks for generation of recreational anglers to catch ( damn I am beginning to sound like you ). And the last item was discussion on counting the customers that have fished with us the last few years and this up coming year as later ammo for when the Separation debate comes up . That is a brief over view from the meeting . I am cc this to the folks that were there and if any of you guys want to add anything for Jeff please feel free. See Ya Jeff Gary __________________ [/quote] Mark W
|
|
|
|
|
Sailfish
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:21:00 PM
Posts: 1,785,
Visits: 7,431
|
|
Matt Mcleod (12/19/2008)
I guess my point is that we don't have a problem. We have the nmfs trying to fix something that's not broken. Once we start negotiating TAC numbers and data we are admitting we have a problem when we don't have a problem. That is my biggest problem with ALL of the ideas I've seen so far. Why are we agreeing to help solve a problem we don't have?? And this question is not meant just for Eugene. I applaud all the work everyone has done in an effort to help us keep our right to snapper fish, but I think all of these ideas are still a way to negotiate with the nmfs and don't address the fact that we have no problem. Why am I wrong?? You are not wrong, actually you couldn't be more right. While the recs, charters, and commercials duke it out, the only people getting what they want are the anti-fishing enviro whack jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:59:27 PM
Posts: 661,
Visits: 1,284
|
|
| Eugene Here is your good friend "Jeff Barger's" Biography from the Environmental Defense Fund website. http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=879 Note that he is trained as a biologist. Mr. Barger is the Environmental Defense Fund representaive Gary Jarvis was trading email with. Barger probably sold out right out of college to the enviromental whack jobs for the money. Wonder if he has ever even wet a line on a Gulf bottom fishing trip? Jeff BargerRegional Fisheries Project Coordinator WorkJeff Barger joined Environmental Defense’s Austin, TX office in August of 2006 as a project coordinator for the Gulf of Mexico fisheries project. He is working to advance innovative, market-based strategies to improve recreational fisheries management throughout the Gulf of Mexico region. Prior to joining Environmental Defense, Barger worked as an aquatic habitats specialist for the National Wildlife Federation where he organized a diverse group of interests to develop equitable alternatives to several water development projects that threatened critical wildlife habitat in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. He has also served as a restoration biologist for The Nature Conservancy. Post-graduate training included investigations of the structure and function of freshwater systems of the intermountain west and the role terrestrial-aquatic linkages play in stream nutrient dynamics. BackgroundB.S – Biology, University of Central Arkansas Click on below web link and you will see that the Environmental Defense Fund was responsible for infusing $505,000 of lobby dollars into the political system in 2008. http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=Environmental+Defense+Fund&year=2008 Money talks and bs + recreational fishing rights walk...
|
|
|
|
|
Cigar Minnow
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/13/2010 1:45:55 PM
Posts: 15,
Visits: 112
|
|
| You underestimate, again. Jeff was actually on Alaska fishing boats for a couple of years, and through his involvement in our fisheries, has probably fished from each of the Gulf states.
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 5:06:08 PM
Posts: 73,
Visits: 1,548
|
|
| Howdy, There is one SEROUS flaw in Jarvis' plan, and it's really quite simple; The for-hire sector (captains and crew) are not allowed to catch ANY snapper - that is the law. 100% OF THE SNAPPER ON FOR-HIRE VESSELS ARE CAUGHT BY RECREATIONAL FISHERMEN. There is no justification for dividing the recreational TAC. All the best, Tom Hilton
Get The Edge - www.Realtime-Navigator.com
|
|
|
|
|
Cigar Minnow
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/13/2010 1:45:55 PM
Posts: 15,
Visits: 112
|
|
Tom
The SOS plan doe not take any of the TAC FROM recreational anglers, you said so yourself. All fish caught on charter boats are caught by recreational anglers. The SOS plan improves the data collection and accountability for all of these anglers (a big chunck of the recreational anglers out there). It is one step in the right direction. Stamps are another step.
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 5:06:08 PM
Posts: 73,
Visits: 1,548
|
|
| Keep Smiling, The purpose of dividing anything is to separate something - in this case the Recreational 49% TAC. It belongs to the Recreational Fishermen, and not to any for-hire operator, and therefore any division of this TAC is not justified nor necessary. Doing this in the name of "data collection" does not fly as there are a myriad of other methods to collect data without removing access to the resource to people who choose not to ride on a for-hire vessel. The "Black Hole" of the recreational industry as explained by Jarvis illustrates his contempt for those recreational fishermen who are not customers of the for-hire industry...they are then competitors for the TAC, thus the need, in the eyes of the proponents of SOS, to divide the TAC. The For-Hire Captains and Crew cannot legally catch any Red Snapper - how can they claim historic catches? 100% of the Red Snapper caught on their charters are caught by Recreational Fishermen - those are the facts. Let's focus on saving the fish and not yourselves. All the best, Tom Hilton
Get The Edge - www.Realtime-Navigator.com
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Red Lip
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/26/2009 10:05:32 PM
Posts: 50,
Visits: 272
|
|
| Tom, Thank you for your astute observation. I hope to meet you at the FFWCC meeting in February in Destin!
Candy Hansard www.ecreef.org
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:38:25 PM
Posts: 613,
Visits: 4,654
|
|
| Tom, it's obvious this "keep smilin" guy thinks you(we) are stupid. His argument is much like trying to convince a child to eat broccoli instead of candy by saying they taste the same. Again I'm going to ask the question, why do we want to collect data?
Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend to lie to you and steal from you so that they can stay fat and happy.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx
If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well. Hot Spots Bait and Tackle 211 Gulf Breeze Parkway, Gulf Breeze FL www.hotspotstackle.com 850-916-7176
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:38:25 PM
Posts: 613,
Visits: 4,654
|
|
capt.eugene (12/19/2008) Matt
I see to your point but the only two options we have are to overthrow the gov or negotiate with them.
I'M for the latter
64 Day season is a problemI don't believe those are the only two options. I think that's what the nmfs would like us to believe, that we have no option but to fight over TAC numbers. Once we concede that we have a problem that we don't have we are in trouble then. At what point is the fishery problem "fixed"? Since there is no problem and you can't fix something that's not broke, how will it be decided that we don't have the problem anymore? We must stop all this arguing and demand that the nmfs proves to us we have a problem. We are not the problem they are! We don't have false data they do! Why should I have to get stamps because your numbers are wrong! We don't have a snapper problem, we have a scientist problem!
Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend to lie to you and steal from you so that they can stay fat and happy.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx
If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well. Hot Spots Bait and Tackle 211 Gulf Breeze Parkway, Gulf Breeze FL www.hotspotstackle.com 850-916-7176
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 5:58:53 PM
Posts: 806,
Visits: 8,150
|
|
Matt Mcleod (12/21/2008) We don't have a snapper problem, we have a scientist problem!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Captain of the toy charter boat "Tuggy" 
|
|
|
|
|
White Marlin
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:41:43 PM
Posts: 3,397,
Visits: 11,132
|
|
If the goal of the SOS is to improve data collection and accountability then get the VMS, get the log books and leave it at that.
If you're running taxi service for recreational anglers, how does their catch differ than mine? Why would it go in a separate pile or come from a separate piece of the pie?
Other than to give you guys more time on the water and the possibility of transfering your commercial IFQ to your charter or vice-versa?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend destroy the recreational fishery for you and I.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well.
|
|
|
|
|
White Marlin
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:41:43 PM
Posts: 3,397,
Visits: 11,132
|
|
And while we're at it.
Keep Smilin, who are you.
Please identify yourself.
Eugene is here as himseld, Mike Lilly, Matt McLeod, Me (my last name is too long for a screen name but it's Zwierzchowski if you're interested.)
Be honest about who you are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Please do not support any of the captains or vessels on the list below. They support the SOS plan and intend destroy the recreational fishery for you and I.
http://saveoursector.com/supporters/supporters_full.aspx If you agree with the above, please copy and paste this as your signature as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Trigger
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:40:32 PM
Posts: 336,
Visits: 1,266
|
|
JoeZ (12/21/2008) If the goal of the SOS is to improve data collection and accountability then get the VMS, get the log books and leave it at that. If you're running taxi service for recreational anglers, how does their catch differ than mine? Why would it go in a separate pile or come from a separate piece of the pie? Other than to give you guys more time on the water and the possibility of transfering your commercial IFQ to your charter or vice-versa?  
|
|
|
|
|
Snapper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:10:48 PM
Posts: 444,
Visits: 1,434
|
|
Hey you guys.
You ever heard IF YOU CAN'T BEAT THEM JOIN THEM!
Tom
It is not jarvis's plan it is the SOS. plan a group of ten got over one hundred signatures and got you all peaved. The no fish for cap & crew is an emerigency rule not law if it is show me please. If We save the fish not ourselves why save the fish.
We are here by GODS hand Jesus feed us fish by his hand if you don't now these FACTS GO TO CHURCH on sunday you will see! unless you all belive the world,space,animals,fish,you and myself. We must just be an acident or a fluke of evalution.
The bottom line is NMFS is cutting days of fishing for us all I can't speak for all but I do now this sixty four days is not enough days to run my buisness.
So I asked for help from GOD and withen a few days I was contacted by Jeff Barger.
The rest is public info.
JOEZ
Who would benifit the rec because commerical can not take the rec share of quota! I would because I get to run My boat to take rec's fishing. FYI I Eugene don't have a Commerical Lic.
Our catch differs because without "taxi's"millions of rec. will not have a ride,capt,deckhend,peace of mind of some gov involvement on there taxi ride/platform.Platform because there is no Sidewalk to stand on when you get out of the Taxi.
The myraid of other data [Tom] refers got us to a 64 day season. And He is wrong on this 100% caught by rec. is false
it started last year and is not law it is inturem rule. He has never been on my boat to see the days when the fish weren't biting well. And myself & the deckhand had to hook every fish so the rec"s could go home with fish.
I'm sorry for the M.S. spell check won't work.
Leave you with this go back to edf's homepage checkout Dr.Jane Lubchenco That should peave you ALL some more
let me know how you like it.
Marry CHRISTmas
Capt. Eugene Coley
"Judge Not least you be Judged"
Southern Born Southern Bred
American By The Grace GOD
|
|
|
|
|
Grouper
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:59:27 PM
Posts: 661,
Visits: 1,284
|
|
PRESS RELEASE Monterey Bay Aquarium Executive Director Applauds Selection of Jane Lubchenco to Head NOAA Last update: 7:24 p.m. EST Dec. 18, 2008 MONTEREY, Calif., Dec 18, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Statement from Julie Packard, executive director of the Monterey Bay Aquarium, on the announcement that President-elect Barack Hussein Obama will appoint Dr. Jane Lubchenco as Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is the nation's principal ocean agency. "I am absolutely delighted that Jane Lubchenco has been named NOAA Administrator by President-elect Obama. This is a great day for the future of the oceans. I've long had an opportunity to work closely with Dr. Lubchenco. She is an extraordinary scientist who brings great creativity and innovation to addressing the grave threats facing our oceans today. She knows the magnitude of the threats and for decades has demonstrated national leadership in addressing these challenges. Today, pollution, overfishing and global warming are taking a huge toll on marine life. It's happening along our coasts, and around the world. Without swift and effective action, we risk causing irreparable damage to ecosystems on which all life depends. Jane Lubchenco has been an impressive advocate for ocean issues. I'm confident that, under her visionary leadership, NOAA will employ the best science on behalf of the oceans. All of us at the Monterey Bay Aquarium look forward to working with Dr. Lubchenco and the Obama administration to protect and restore the oceans." Background: Julie Packard served on the Pew Oceans Commission, is vice-chair of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and was the 1998 recipient of the Audubon Medal for Conservation. Dr. Lubchenco is past-president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Ecological Society of America; a MacArthur Fellow; recipient of the Heinz Environmental Medal; and served with Julie Packard on the Pew Oceans Commission, and the boards of trustees for the Monterey Bay Aquarium, the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. SOURCE Monterey Bay Aquarium Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved End of Story Mark W
|
|